FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Sheri Herndon or Greg Ruggiero at (206) 261-0184; (917) 279-0318
Web Site: www.indymedia.org
CURRENT HEADLINE NOW AVAILABLE ON-LINE:
Police Fire on Protesters with Rubber Bullets and Tear Gas: Seattle Police Chief Denies the Use of Rubber Bullets Despite Eyewitness
SEATTLE. Over 300 independent video makers, radio producers, journalists, and activists have created an Independent Media Center in downtown Seattle to provide up-to-the-minute coverage of The World Trade Organization (WTO) Ministerial meeting and the massive public protests that are now shutting down the city.
Armed with cell phones, lap-top computers, video cameras, web cams, tape recorders, and their passion for justice, these grassroots journalists are pioneering the use of the world wide web to publish breaking stories as they happen.
"The purpose of the IMC is to get people's voices heard," said Jeff Perlstein, one of the Center's co-founders. "We're providing a powerful aternative to the mainstream press that's without censorship, editing, or corporate bias. This collaboration is about people telling their own stories and rounding out a much needed public debate on the issues that impact our communities."
The IMC is taking use of the world wide web to a new level of sophistication by posting and distributing live coverage as it happens, giving voice to viewpoints ordinarily ignored by mainstream media. As this new technology develops, it can potentially allow every level of society the ability to express their views on social and economic issues that affect the planet as a whole.
People simply log on and post their story. The unedited story goes into the cue and becomes part of the site where anyone can access it. "IMC's page is receiving and posting stories from as far away as India and Australia," says another IMC co-founder Jim Mateson.
In addition to their website, the IMC is presenting daily a 60-minute video satellite-cast segment in collaboration with Deep Dish Satellite TV, Paper Tiger TV, BigNoise Films, Changing America, Citizen Vagrom, FreeSpeech TV, and Whisper Media. Radio producers are also putting together audio segments featuring coverage of the dayís highlights. Tonight the IMC will launch live streaming audio from Studio X.
"Given the magnitude of the issues involved in globalization, the IMC's breakthrough in public news production and dissemination is an historic event in its own right," says Perlstein. "We at the IMC are hopeful that this project will serve as a model and catalyst to be emulated in the new millennium."
Sociology Department/Project Censored
Sonoma State University
1801 East Cotati Ave.
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Media analysis, critiques and news reports
December 1, 1999
As trade ministers from over 130 countries meet in Seattle this week for the World Trade Organization summit, tens of thousands of activists from all over the world have converged on the city to protest both the undemocratic structure of the group and its record on labor and environmental issues.
But the news coverage anticipating the protests has shed little light on the specific charges being made against the WTO by most of the protesters. As the conference gets under way on November 30, a few trends in the coverage have already emerged.
To begin, news stories preceding the conference demonstrated a fundamental lack of understanding of the issues involved. A November 1st article in US News & World Report was headlined "Hell No, We Won't Trade: How an obscure trade organization became a lightning rod for protest." While one can debate the merits of labeling a group with international jurisdiction over global trade an "obscure" organization, "We Won't Trade" is a grossly misleading characterization of the anti-WTO arguments.
The article goes on to note that "For the moment, the movement against free trade seems to have little traction in the United States." This is a puzzling conclusion for an article that notes that "up to 50,000 demonstrators" are planned to "attend mass rallies, a march, teach-ins and prayer services" to protest the Seattle trade meeting. Nonetheless, the assertion is backed up by this: "All major presidential candidates support free trade and the WTO."
Reports prior to the summit, and many appearing this week, argue that the WTO stands to "open up" trade around the globe. That is inaccurate, as Dean Baker pointed out recently in FAIR's Economic Reporting Review ( http://www.fair.org/err/991108.html ):
"While its rules are designed to facilitate foreign investment, such as a U.S. auto manufacturer building a factory in Indonesia, in other areas the WTO has taken little action to facilitate trade, while in some areas its rules are intended to impede free trade. In the case of professional services, such as those provided by doctors, lawyers and other highly paid professionals, the WTO has done virtually nothing to facilitate international trade and competition. In the case of intellectual property claims, such as patents and copyrights, the WTO has worked to impose these protectionist barriers on developing nations, at an enormous cost to their consumers."
Nor do many media accounts explain what the protesters are focusing on -- in most cases, a specific set of concerns and issues that have been before the WTO in the past few years (summarized well at http://www.accuracy.org/press_releases/PR112999.htm ). ABC's Peter Jennings commented that "it seems as though every group with every complaint from every corner of the world is represented in Seattle this week."
CBS Evening News explained some of the background on the same night's newscast, but bungled one of the core criticisms of the WTO. Dan Rather reported that the WTO had ruled on many environmental issues, but declined to make the simple point that the WTO has ruled *against* environmental restrictions in every case that has come before it. Indeed, Rather's reference to the WTO's ruling on "fishing restrictions aimed at saving endangered species" might have mislead viewers into thinking that the WTO was intervening on behalf of threatened animals.
Some reports, rather than dealing with the concerns of the protestors, instead focused on the hypothetical danger they pose. Tony Snow's first question to teamsters president James Hoffa, Jr. on Fox News Sunday (11/28/99) was: "Do you worry that there's going to be any violence there?" Likewise, NBC Nightly News (11/29/99) devoted their lead WTO segment to security concerns in Seattle ("The stakes are high, so is the security, so is the provocation"), highlighting local authorities' precautions against "a potential chemical or biological attack."
The report was followed by a segment by NBC financial correspondent Mike Jensen extolling the benefits of free trade. Jensen concluded that "most experts say getting rid of trade barriers on both sides is a good thing for American workers and consumers. But no matter what comes out of this four-day meeting -- and a lot of analysts don't think it will be much -- world trade has such momentum, almost nothing can get in its way."
Yet, as Dean Baker points out in a recent ERR, there is "near consensus among economists that trade has been one of the factors that has increased wage inequality in the United States over the last two decades." But that "consensus" is decidedly harder to find in mainstream press accounts.
The theme of free trade "momentum" is also present in a story on MSNBC's website ( http://www.msnbc.com/news/340513.asp ), which includes a link to a special section encouraging readers to "find out more about the hurdles on the way to free trade."
Similarly, a recent Associated Press report called protesters' concerns "far-fetched," and continued by noting that "for every campaigner lying down on a sidewalk this week to protest the WTO's efforts to reduce trade barriers, there is a happily employed Seattleite whose job depends on free commerce."
A disturbing indication of mainstream media attitudes toward coverage of the WTO meeting came when ABC's Seattle affiliate announced that it would "not devote coverage to irresponsible or illegal activities of disruptive groups," adding that "KOMO 4 News is taking a stand on not giving some protest groups the publicity they want.... So if you see us doing a story on a disruption, but we don't name the group or the cause, you'll know why." In a revealing choice of words, news director Joe Barnes described civil disobedience as "illegally disrupting the commerce of the city." (KOMO has requested comments on its policy at firstname.lastname@example.org .)
This decision by a corporate-owned news outlet to explicitly ignore the messages of groups practicing civil disobedience underscores the importance of independent journalism. Organizers in Seattle have made a priority of setting up an independent media center ( http://www.indymedia.org ), and much is planned for the coming week, including a daily newspaper, a daily radio broadcast (World Trade Watch Radio, http://www.radioproject.org ) and from-the-scene video documentaries that will be available via satellite to many public television stations.
For more information, see FAIR's Resources on Trade at
Give for Change: A Special Opportunity to Help FAIR
FAIR's e-mail list has grown by leaps and bounds over the past year -- we now have over 6,000 subscribers. In that time, our list has become one of our most valuable assets. It allows FAIR's Action Alerts and Media Advisories to be quickly distributed all over the world, and helps media activists directly address their concerns to editors, producers and journalists at numerous media institutions.
In the past few months, FAIR Action Alerts have helped activists make their voices heard at ABC, the New York Times, USA Today and PBS, to name a few. It's a service FAIR provides for free, and we're more than happy to do it -- but it does cost us something to produce.
We'd like to see our activist network grow even more next year. But to make that happen, we need your help. Thanks to a matching fund established by Working Assets and eGrants.org, any $25 donation that you make to FAIR from now until the end of the year will DOUBLE.
Please help us expand our programs in the new millennium with this matching fund that doubles your gift to us.
FAIR sometimes approaches EXTRA! readers to ask for money beyond the price of subscribing. Subscriptions don't cover the cost of all the things FAIR does beyond putting out a magazine: communicating with the media, supporting grassroots activism, producing our weekly radio show CounterSpin, conducting research studies, expanding our website, producing op-ed columns and articles, publishing Economic Reporting Review every week, and, last but not least, sending out FAIR's Action Alerts.
If you are inclined to make a donation toward FAIR's considerable work, to support our underpaid and overworked staff, now is the time.
And thank you! Your help really makes a big difference.
130 W. 25th Street
New York, NY 10001
Feel free to respond to FAIR ( email@example.com ). We can't reply to everything, but we will look at each message. We especially appreciate documented example of media bias or censorship. All messages to the 'FAIR-L' list will be forwarded to the editor of the list.
Also, please send copies of email correspondence, including any responses, to us at: firstname.lastname@example.org .
Feel free to spread this message around. Put it on conferences where it is appropriate. We depend on word of mouth to get our message out, so please let others know about FAIR and this mailing list.
Don't miss a single e-mail from FAIR-L.
You can subscribe to FAIR-L at our web site:
Or, you can send a "subscribe FAIR-L enter your full name" command to LISTSERV@AMERICAN.EDU.
The subscriber list is kept confidential, so no need to worry about spammers.
Please support FAIR by becoming a member.
You will receive FAIR's magazine, EXTRA! and its newsletter, EXTRA!
Update. You can become a member by calling 1-800-847-3993 from 9 to 5 Eastern Time (be sure to tell them you got the information on-line) or by sending $19 with your name and address to:
P.O. Box 170
Congers, NY 10920-9930
* News Release Issued by the International Secretariat of Amnesty International *
News Service 224/99
AI INDEX: IOR 30/10/99
30 November 1999
There is a worrying absence of any meaningful discussion on human rights safeguards at the World Trade Organization's negotiations in Seattle, Amnesty International said today.
"No agreement on further investment liberalisation -- such as the Multilateral Agreement on Investment or its successors -- should be formalised until a comprehensive analysis of its impact on human rights protection has been carried out," the human rights organization said. "In the absence of such analysis, any negotiations are premature"
"Multinational investors -- wherever they choose to operate -- have a responsibility to protect human rights," the organization added. "This includes protecting the human rights of their own employees and the rights of the members of the communities where they have economic interests."
The human rights organization takes no position on further trade liberalisation or the creation of an international framework and set of regulations to govern foreign investments. However, it does believe that any such negotiations should include a central component concerned with the worldwide protection of human rights.
Amnesty International is concerned that the ongoing global negotiations aimed at liberalizing trade and investment rules -- including the now discontinued draft Multilateral Agreement on Investment -- may conflict with the obligations of states to enforce crucial provisions of international treaties such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Conventions of the International Labour Organization.
1 Easton Street
London, United Kingdom
You may repost this message onto other sources provided the main text is not altered in any way and both the header crediting Amnesty International and this footer remain intact. Only the list subscription message may be removed.
To subscribe to amnesty-L, send a message to <email@example.com> with "subscribe amnesty-L" in the message body. To unsubscribe, send a message to <firstname.lastname@example.org> with "unsubscribe amnesty-L" in the message body. If you have problem signing off, contact <owner-amnesty-L@oil.ca>. <owner-amnesty-L@oil.ca> handles only messages concerning list administration. Past and current Amnesty news services can be found at <http://www.amnesty.org/news/>.
Visit <http://www.amnesty.org> for information about Amnesty International and for other AI publications. Contact email@example.com if you need to get in touch with the International Secretariat of Amnesty International.
Kirby The Konspiracy Boy Says, "I NEED 2 KONFORM!!!"