News item 1 081204 SEP 97 By Maxine Frith, PA News, in Paris The bodyguard who was the only survivor of the crash which killed Diana, Princess of Wales, is beginning to recover from his serious injuries, it emerged today. His mother and step-father, who have been visiting Trevor Rees-Jones daily since the crash, told a French journalist at the hospital this morning that their son was "deeply upset" about the tragedy. He apparently told his mother: "I feel guilty about the crash but there was absolutely nothing I could have done." Mr. Rees-Jones, 29, suffered severe head and facial injuries in the crash and is still drifting in and out of consciousness, according to hospital sources. A spokeswoman for the Pitie Salpetriere hospital in Paris said: "He is heavily sedated and is not yet fully conscious, but his condition improves." The spokeswoman said that, contrary to speculation in the press, Mr. Rees-Jones had not suffered brain damage and had not lost his tongue in the accident. . News Item 2 .c The Associated Press LONDON (Sept. 12) - The bodyguard who survived the crash that killed Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed and their driver doesn't yet know they are dead, according to a published report today. The Mirror newspaper quoted doctors treating Trevor Rees-Jones at a hospital in Paris as saying he is still too ill to be told and may not be informed for a few more weeks. Rees-Jones, 29, who was Fayed's bodyguard, was the sole survivor of the Aug. 31 crash in a Paris tunnel. He suffered severe chest injuries and is still recovering from 10 hours of surgery a week ago to reconstruct his face. The Mirror quoted his mother, Jill Rees-Jones, as saying: ''He's unconscious most of the time. His jaw is wired and he can't really speak. He is not fit enough to be told about Diana and Dodi but the good news is he's recovering well.'' News Item 3 c The Associated Press LONDON (Sept. 12) - The bodyguard who survived the crash that killed Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed and their driver doesn't yet know they are dead, according to a published report today. The Mirror quoted doctors treating Trevor Rees-Jones at a hospital in Paris as saying he is still too ill to be told, and may not be informed for a few more weeks. Rees-Jones, 29, who was Fayed's bodyguard, was the sole survivor of the Aug. 31 crash in a Paris tunnel. He suffered severe chest injuries and is still recovering from 10 hours of surgery a week ago to reconstruct his face. In Paris, the Le Figaro daily quoted an unidentified source close to the investigation as saying Rees-Jones may not even be able to remember the crash. Rees-Jones had received heavy doses of anesthesia, which could have caused partial amnesia that wiped out his memory of the crash and the hours immediately beforehand, the source said. Investigators hope that Rees-Jones will be able to describe what happened that night - in particular, shed some light on the actions of pursuing paparazzi and of driver Henri Paul. News Item 4 By NICOLAS MARMIE .c The Associated Press PARIS (Sept. 19) - Bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones, the sole survivor of the accident that killed Princess Diana, does not remember the circumstances of the crash, a judicial source said today. The source spoke to The Associated Press after the judge investigating the case had his first meeting with Rees-Jones in the Paris hospital where he is recuperating. The source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, had seen the written report of Judge Herve Stephan's meeting with Rees-Jones. No further details from the meeting were immediately available. Doctors had said all along that the large doses of anesthesia given to Rees-Jones during surgery, along with the trauma of the accident, might affect his memory. The following is a partial reprint from the U.K. website at -- http://www.argonet.co.uk/users/dmd.ham/diMI6.htm This is not original material, but is owned and copyrighted by its authors. 14th September 1997 Diana: LOOSE CANNON TERMINATED BY MI6 - The 9th Release While she had started out as a constitutional liability, Diana was now actively attacking the constitutional elite. She was threatening to destroy the British constitutional system which had done her so much harm and treated her as merely a slab of meat, an incubator of heirs, a stooge of the House of Windsor. But not only was Diana now seen to be attacking the Public State, she was now doing something far, far more dangerous - she was attacking the most evil sector of the Private State - the Arms industry. Diana was speaking out against land-mines and calling for a total worldwide ban on their manufacture and sale. This was at a time when the Private state was doing a pretty good job of smothering centrist and left-of-centre calls within the New Labour party for a ban. Here was Diana, stirring it all up, jet-setting around the world, mingling with more ethical world-leaders, getting very good support. World-wide Diana was quietly making many enemies. Her actions were particularly upsetting to the Arms Barons in Britain, where lower-tech weaponry such as landmines is a big industrial deal. And of course, Arms Exporters are monitored and aided by secret security services, occasionally in 'legitimate intelligence gathering', most often in the protection of Western puppet-dictatorships, which provide markets for killing machines and provide an excuse for Western Armed Forces to stay tooled-up. Diana had been the target of intelligence attacks before at the hands of Britain's bumbling MI5, now she was to be targeted on a much higher level - she was to cross the path of the world-wide secret government where intelligence agencies, big corporations, Royal Houses, powerful individuals, neo-Chivalraic Orders, and powerful secret societies merge into a blur. The British wing was to act on both worldwide and domestic concerns through the infamous MI6. With Diana's death, Charles and his mother would be set to gain complete control over the Princes, the increasing popularity of Diana over Charles could be curtailed, the British Arms Industry could lance an irritating boil. Yet Diana was not alone in getting up the nose of the British system. Another individual was up to the same thing - Muhammad Al-Fayed, who was quite instrumental in bringing to an end the Conservative Party's long-standing hold on power in England. This was an Egyptian citizen who had power to destroy a British Government. The once ally of the British establishment was now it's victorious enemy. Al-Fayed, in his former days as establishment darling, had struck up an association with Diana. This was very much renewed after Labour won the election and Diana and her sons took a holiday with Al-fayed on his substantial yacht. This was really rubbing the establishment's nose in it! It was saying, 'I've undermined you, now I've taken your country's most prized woman. The heir to your throne sees me as an Uncle'. Al-Fayed encouraged his playboy son, Dodi, to strike up relations with the Princess and soon there was a much publicised romance. It had now gone too far for the establishment. Diana had undermined the British constitutional system and was threatening a key industry, and, to top it all, this Johnny Foreigner had made them look like fools. Not only this, a possible Al-Fayed half-brother to the Heir would have been just too unsettling for the Establishment. Diana had to be terminated. If they could get Al-Fayed too, so much the better. And so all MI6 needed to do was pick it's moment. Diana's Merc may well have been tampered with in some way to ensure she is killed (stunt teams alter the structure of cars all the time). The paparazzi are fairly *amiable*, not an evil horde as they're being portrayed on the news at the moment (this is almost certainly now a cover-story). Diana smiles at the cameras, she's sparkling. Diana and Dodi sit in the back of the car. Dodi's 'Security Man' drives. A front seat passenger who may be British intelligence also rides, possibly in some sort of shielding to protect him from the forthcoming impact. The car speeds away along on it's way to a private house. The paparazzi follow on hair-dryer motorcycles but do nothing to adversely interfere with the car. The Merc enters tunnel with little or no traffic. There are few possible witnesses about - the dark tunnel provides good cover. The Motorcycles follow behind, not causing too much trouble. Possibly, a 'British Agent' (either Rees-Jones or an external obstructor) forces crash, car crumples, as it may have been set-up to. The concrete tunnel is an ideal place to smash up a car. Britain's Queen of Hearts is injured, later to die. Al-Fayed's son is dead on scene. Driver is dead. Paparazzi on bike are rounded up by French Police. Ambulance is somewhat late. Only a few witnesses. Information implicating paparazzi is disseminated by British intelligence through the BBC. Paparazzi are possible witnesses to some of the the actual events. Their film-roles are taken from them. MI6, I believe, accomplish mission... *** Very early reports quoted witnesses as seeing/hearing an explosion, rather like a terrorist attack. Several witnesses that were in the proximity of the tunnel just before the crash said they heard two distinct explosions, the first being louder than the second. An American email respondent, echoing many others, spoke of an American woman who was unable but to repeat the word 'explosion' almost as if searching for a different word, trying to say 'crashing' but aware of the dishonesty in saying so. In frustration, she again said 'explosions'. Many people saw this America Couple on CNN, and it was reported the day-after the crash on ITV's Teletext Service but this testimony was not heard again - ever. ********* Whatever the real source of the following material, I believe that the historical background provided and some of the questions raised to be interesting, thought-provoking and worth some consideration. Date: Friday, September 5, 1997 10:28:38 PM From: voltron@voy.net (Jon Locke) "Ru Mills" WHOEVER CONTROLS PRINCESS DIANA RULES THE WORLD Princess Diana and her soon-to-be husband, Dodi Fayed, were fatally injured in the Pont de l'Alma tunnel. The site is ancient, dating back to the time of the Merovingian kings (ca. 500 - 751 A.D.), and before. In pre-Christian times, the Pont de l'Alma was a pagan sacrificial site. Note that in the pagan connotation, at least, sacrifice is not to be confused with murder: the sacrificial victim had to be a willing participant. In the time of the Merovingian kings, the Pont de l'Alma was an underground chamber. Founder of the Merovingian dynasty was Merovaeus. Merovaeus followed the pagan cult of Diana. In Middle English, "soul" (Alma) has as etymology "descended from the sea." "Pont," has as a Latin root "pontifex," meaning a Roman high priest. (See also pons, pontis -- bridge; passage.) "Alma" comes from the Latin "almus," meaning nourishing. One translation of Pont de l'Alma would be "bridge of the soul." Another would be "passage of nourishment." All true European royalty is descended from the Merovingians, which are believed to be descendants of Jesus Christ. During the Merovingian era, if two kings had a dispute over property, it was settled in combat at Pont de l'Alma. According to legend, anyone killed there goes straight to Heaven and sits at the right hand of God, watching over all his foe was to do. The person killed in combat was actually considered to be the "winner," since he became God's eyes on earth and even could manipulate events. The current British royal family are imposters. The House of Windsor is a fraud. But the lineage of Lady Diana Spencer goes back to Charles II of the House of Stewart. The House of Stewart is of "true" royal blood. Diana's sons, William and Harry, have 3-quarters true nobility in their blood. Princess Diana was in a powerful position. Two main factions vied for control over her: (1)the New World Order faction, founded on an alliance between King William III (Bank of England, modern system of finance, and "national debt" all beginning during his reign) and later, the Rothschilds, and (2) the true nobility of Europe. Dodi Fayed, beloved of Lady Diana, is a cousin of Adnan Khashoggi, a CIA asset involved in sales of arms to Iran -- he and Oliver North. Adnan Khashoggi is part of the Saudi royal family. Through marrying Dodi Fayed, Diana would have been marrying into the Saudi royal family. She might have had to convert to Islam. British intelligence (MI-6) arranged the deaths of Lady Diana and Dodi Fayed. It was imperative that the Saudi royal family not have control over Diana. The driver of the ill-fated Mercedes was a "Manchurian candidate" (brainwashed tool), with connections to the French military. How did so much alcohol get into his system? Amounts suggested in mass media reports are truly staggering -- so much alcohol that the driver would have had to been carried to the car. Emailed Testimony from "Paparazzi" Oct.10, 1997 Dear Recipients: I thought all would be interested in the full text of the email communication quoted in my report, received from someone who describes himself as one of the photographers following (at some distance!!) Princess Diana's car the night she was killed (murdered). The realization that the Princess of Wales was if fact assassinated is apparently dawning on an ever-increasing number of people at this time. I'm hearing it discussed more and more often (also more and more openly) here and many seem to feel that it's as though history is repeating itself -- Mary Queen of Scots all over again; the usurpers trying to crush the House of Stuart once again, but not before re incorporating the Stuart bloodline into that of the Windsors. I figured also that I'd forward all the URL for following UK website which has on it an article on the Princess' assassination -- www.argonet.co.uk/users/ /dmd.ham/diMI6.htm. A continually growing constituency clearly feel that Diana's untimely end was certainly not as it was originally portrayed -- a terribly tragic but completely unforseeable and genuine chance accident, but instead was a case of brutal and highly charged murder. It's essential that major news organisations go after the truth aggressively regarding the events in Paris on August 31. We all have a right to know (the truth), and who the perpetrators of the assassination would be. All recipients are welcome to and urged to reprint or forward this and the previously emailed report as desired, and/or quote any part. Take Care, John A, Quinn ********* Name: Jean Merc (not real name) Website: Referred by: Just Surfed On In! From: Southern France Time: 1997-09-17 08:51:00 Frankly say, I am not dare to do this earlier, but "I must" in the name of the justice. My name is Jean Merceilles, a French (not a real name), one of photographer who followed Diana and her companion Dodi Al-fayed until their death in a car-crash. (paris tunnel -- 31 august 1997) I was lucky at that time, while the accident took place, I am 60 metres from the spot. When I heard a very loud sound came from the tunnel, I jumped from one of my friend's bike (who is now detained) to inspect the scene. From the wreckage, (I noticed that was a Mercedes Benz that owned by Dodi) I could see a hand of someone waving at us to seek some help. With a terrible shock, I found that was the hand of princess. I could not see her face clearly, as a warm blood streaming all over her face. She still alive and crying painfully. With "discourage feeling", I forced myself to take some picture of her -- (the pictures and negative are with me now and I am not intend to sell it for profit). From the distance, I could see people already gathering to see what was happening there. 5 minutes later, I heard police and ambulance coming from the north. My friends was still there and looks like very handful to the victims. I decided to run away by taking a taxi to a studio. 60 minutes later, I heard all of my friends were detained by police. To avoid being accused, quickly I bought an air-ticket to the nearest country from France. Not the country that I wrote to you now!!-- as I am at South East Asia. (When this message being published, consider I am not here anymore. Thanks to Mr. Fahrul Hakim to give me a little time to explain the truth.) I do not understand the world, for accusing us (photographers) for Diana and Dodi death. As a matter of fact, It looks like all people of the world pointing at us as we are the greatest criminal of a crime that we did not responsible. I still remember the words came from Diana's throat before she died. "help... someone outside plan to kill us". From her voice tone, I guess she was very frightened. she needs our help badly. That means I guess, there could be a third party behind the tragedy who had set up "everything" from the beginning. ( I do not say CIA, British Monarchy's spy or ...etc.) As a conclusion, it is totally unfair to keep 'us' in guilty and prison as the real killer remain freely outside. "Who is the next victims?" WHERE IS THE JUSTICE THAT WE FIGHT FOR?" & do the world has forgotten our contribution who brought Diana into glamorous world ?" yours sincerely, Merceilles, -- -any feedback please send to hakim@pl.jaring.my (hakim's Public CyberCafe Co.) RE: "Paparazzi's" Emailed Message Oct. 11. 1997 Dear Recipients: My own advice, which I have emailed to the address at the end of the message from paparazzi "Mr. Merceilles", was this; to either return to France with his photographic evidence and present himself with witnesses to Paris police, and pubicly state his eyewitness testimony, including words supposedly spoken to him by Diana; other than that, to present himself to a judicial authority in whatever country he is in with witnesses, and make some kind of formal deposition of his evidence, eyewitness testimony etc. in that country which can be forwarded to French authorities, and no matter what, to publicly state his information to the international news media. If "Merceilles" doesn't do something along these lines I can't take his message especially seriously, tho' it may very well be valid, and he's just extremely, maybe overly fearful for his life. (a wimp?) John Quinn Princess Diana/Coverup Firmly in Place Dear Recipients: It's been pointed out to me that due to the extreme strictures of Britain's Official (National) Secrets Act, certain topics can be designated as matters of national security of which any published (or public?) discussion is completely forbidden ; if this order is violated, the "offenders" can be immediately incarcerated, their publication facilities etc. closed/dismantled; further, if any mention whatsoever of those actions (i.e. against the publisher of the forbidden information) is made by any other publisher, the publishers of that subsequent information are likewise subject to the exact same penalty; thereby enforcing press censorship of the very fact of press censorship! I imagine that this extraordinarily restrictive situation would impinge severely upon the ability of any news organisation to deal with certain matters at all. According to other terms of this National Secrets Act, any publisher/news organisation who receives information, publication of which would violate the previously noted terms, is obliged to inform British authorities of that fact -- as well as the source of the information. How nice. It's been further pointed out to me that MI5 and MI6 are literally sworn to protect and uphold the monarchy and the (German) royal family (lower case intended) above all else and at all costs; thereby the "termination" of Diana was seen by those designated operatives enjoined to carry it out as a necessity to ensure the continued rule of monarchy -- an absolute necessity. I'm not suggesting that the situation in the U.S. is any better; perhaps superficially there is more of an illusion of freedom in that regard. However in terms of what is actually "on the books" I can't think of any comparable law effective in the U.S. ... yet. Of course the NSA, CIA, etc. pretty much write their own program in such matters in the U.S., and if the actual information which the public receives through the media is completely manipulated anyway, the end result is pretty much the same. The method in the U.S. seems also to involve more sinister threats and certainly malicious and/or deadly actions to enforce secrecy on such (top-secret) matters. At least one journalist (not me) here has been warned by certain CIA operatives to back off the Princess Diana story, or he may "get his fingers burned." The UK law noted ensures more direct and complete control with much less chance of leakage regarding such state secrets however. Very unfortunate either way. John Quinn